PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

WikiLeaks Backers Hit MasterCard And Visa In Cyberstrike

By Mercator Advisory Group
December 21, 2010
in Analysts Coverage
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Big Data And The Art Of Personalized Banking - PaymentsJournal

e-banking concept: young woman with online bank application phone at the park

Supporters of Wikileaks apparently mounted major denial of service attacks against the corporate websites of Visa and MasterCard in retaliation for the payment services’ discontinuation of accepting payments for Wikileaks donations. Visa’s corporate website was down temporarily, but was later restored, while at MasterCard:

MasterCard, calling the attack “a concentrated effort to flood our corporate website with traffic and slow access,” said all its services had been restored and that account data was not at risk.

But it said the attack, mounted by hackers using simple tools posted on the Web, had extended beyond its website to payment processing technology, leaving some customers unable to make online payments using MasterCard software.

The big issue of course that the attacks raised was of course the security of the payments networks themselves:

For Visa and MasterCard, the world’s two largest credit and debit card processors, the attacks raised questions about the vulnerability of core operations — and consumers’ ability to use credit, debit and online payments instead of cash.

Nevertheless, investors in both companies largely reacted with a shrug. Shares of both companies closed up over 1 percent, although Visa slipped slightly in after-hours trading.

Read article: http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2010/12/08/technology/tech-us-wikileaks.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

The plot thickened, so to speak, with the release of a cable about Visa and MasterCard and their Russian market entry concerns from Wikileaks itself:

The state department cable

from 1 February, entitled ‘Russian draft bill would require on-shore credit card processing’, outlines concerns on the planned law for a Russian National Payments System.

The draft law would have seen the creation of a national payment card system (NPCS), operated by a consortium of state-owned banks, processing payments for all members, collecting an estimated $4 billion a year in fees.

According to the cable, Visa’s public relations head in Russia, Dmitriy Vishnyakov, told the US that Russia’s plan follows the “China model” on payment card systems.

The cable concludes: “While the draft legislation has yet to be submitted to the Duma and can still be amended, post will continue to raise our concerns with senior GOR officials. We recommend that senior USG officials also take advantage of meetings with their Russian counterparts, including through the Bilateral Presidential Commission, to press the GOR to change the draft text to ensure U.S. payment companies are not adversely affected.”

Read full article: See other news related to the blocking of Wikileaks donations by Visa and MasterCard:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20024776-281.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20

http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/business-11938320

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    agentic commerce

    Demystifying the Agentic Commerce Enigma

    February 11, 2026
    payment gateways

    How Payment Gateways for Businesses Can Help You Offer Your Customers More Options

    February 10, 2026
    Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Extends Mandate for Tokenization to June '22

    Late Payments? Governments Are Taking Action

    February 9, 2026
    ai phishing

    The Fraud Epidemic Is Testing the Limits of Cybersecurity

    February 6, 2026
    stablecoins b2b payments

    Stablecoins and the Future of B2B Payments: Faster, Cheaper, Better

    February 5, 2026
    Payment Facilitator

    The Payment Facilitator Model as a Growth Strategy for ISVs

    February 4, 2026
    Simplifying Payment Processing? Payment Orchestration Can Help , multi-acquiring merchants

    Multi-Acquiring Is the New Standard—Are Merchants Ready?

    February 3, 2026
    ACH Network, credit-push fraud, ACH payments growth

    What’s Driving the Rapid Growth in ACH Payments

    February 2, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2024 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result