The Chase Sapphire Credit Card: A Victim of Its Own Success?

Chase Makes a Confident Move into Credit Card Loyalty Programs

Chase Makes a Confident Move into Credit Card Loyalty Programs

Chase’s Sapphire card is certainly a success for both cardholders and the nation’s largest credit card issuer. The New York issuer rocked the credit card world when it launched a high-fee, feature-rich product that had lines of people queued up to pay a $450 annual fee with promises of first year rewards of between 60,000 and 100,000 points.  Point bonuses seemed to vary as waitlines ebbed and flowed, but either way, a rewards junkie could offset the high fee with rich points.

Today’s story in the WSJ brings up an interesting issue with Chase’s top-end card, which is an unlikely, unintended result of the card’s success. The issue is probably a “good” problem, but it certainly needs better positioning.

In short, the cardholder claims that there is no reason to use the United-Chase co-brand because the Chase Sapphire card does it all.

Hmm. This hits a chord for me, personally.

This issue didn’t happen with Chase, but it influenced my decision on my American Express card. I used to have a Delta Gold American Express card, which was nice, but I found that it never got me on the plane faster than any other card because of Delta’s many “priority classes”. I traded it in at Amex for a Blue Cash Preferred card, which is an awesome product. 6% cash back on groceries and automated payments at Netflix. So far this year, the card paid me back 3:1 on the annual fee. I love Delta but not that much.

The same logic holds for this issue reported by the WSJ.

It is hard to get the number of United Frequent Flyers, but considering that the airline has 4,500 departures a day and 340 destinations in 54 countries, it has to be measured in the tens of millions, so that is enough of a referral base for even Chase to worry about.

Such an issue. Is Sapphire “too good”? Or, should the United card be amped up?

We are not talking peanuts, says the article.

Either way, this illustrates the importance of reward programs to U.S. issuers, and the importance of co-brands to the airline industry.

Overview by Brian Riley, Director, Credit Advisory Service at Mercator Advisory Group

Exit mobile version