Register for PaymentsJournal
search
Home
|
Browse
|
News
|
Perspectives
|
Mercator
|
Industry
|
Strategy
|
Library
|
Calendar
|
Jobs
|
Buyer's Guide
Mercator Perspectives
Back to Perspectives
New Banks and Old Models
August 8, 2012
Debit
|
Banking_Channels
Patricia Hewitt
Mercator Advisory Group
Listen to Patricia Hewitt read her Perspective
Watching new banking strategies unfold, such as the recent roll out of Simple, I'm struck by the idea that while these developers may be re-envisioning the banking experience for a digital audience, they don’t seem to be doing much to re-invent the business model that supports retail financial institutions. As a result, are these new products truly moving the industry into the future or simply creating a new competitor in an old arena?
Recently, I examined a number of these new bank offers in a report we published in June,
Banking 2.0: Innovation, Disruption, and the Better Idea
, in which I pointed out that most of these banks are front ends to existing banks and further, that the debit card used to access money on deposit is a prepaid card. Finally, one of the primary banking partners for this kind of offer is one that falls below the Regulation II threshold, thus debit card interchange fees aren't regulated. As I pointed out in this analysis, this is not meant to disparage these companies, since they are recreating the user experience and piloting new ways to think about the consumption and delivery of financial services and for that, they should be taken seriously.
Rather, these new products don't address the fundamental problem that retail banks face, which is a dismantling of the historical business model, one based on interchange and exception fees; since these new banks depend on existing interchange fee revenue streams to fund their offers. I have to question then if this is really moving the industry forward towards a new business model or just putting on a fresh coat of paint? As the market absorbs new feature functionality, creates new digital means of accessing funds on deposit, and offers higher level of convenience and relevancy to consumers - isn't that worth something to the end user? I suggest that this is the perfect opportunity to break through the concept of free services towards a model that is more balanced across stakeholders.
That means that consumers should pay their fair share of the cost of services and what better time to connect fee to value than when an industry is expanding services. I would challenge these forward-thinking developers to consider how best to move the industry into the next generation of services through the establishment of a sustainable business model based on a balanced base of revenue streams and designed to once again highlight the advantages a highly sophisticated financial services industry offers to all its stakeholders.
Contact Patricia Hewitt
Search Perspectives
Search by Topic
Credit
Debit
Emerging Technologies
Prepaid
International
Customer-centric Delivery Channels
Sort by Author
Aaron Bills
Alex Johnson
Ben Jackson
Bill Perry
Brad Fauss
Brett King
Buckley Sandler LLP
Chris McWilton
Christina Sommer
Christopher T. Cox
Dan Kramer
Dan Shannon
Dave Talach
Dave Wilkes
David Fish
David Kaminsky
David Montague
David Stone
David Wallace
Diane McGuire
Drago Dzerve
Ed OBrien
Eric Lindeen
George Peabody
Gustav Khambatta
Henry Helgeson
Jeffrey Green
Karen Augustine
Karen Gordon
Ken Paterson
Kevin Jones
Kirsten Trusko
Kurt Adams
Lori Breitzke
Louis Blatt
Mark Becker
Michael Misasi
MPC
Patricia Hewitt
Patricia McGinnis
Patrick Collins
Paul Logan
Paul Rasori
Paul Tomasofsky
Ramel Lindsay
Sandra Chesnutt
Scott Lewin
Shane Fiztpatrick
Shannon Martin
Stacy Gorkoff
Stephanie Ericksen
Steve Elefant
Stewart Stockdale
T. Jack Williams
Tally Oliveau
Terry Xie
Tim Sloane
Todd Ablowitz
Tom Burgess
Tristan Hugo-Webb
Will Hernandez
View All
Quick Links
Advertise With Us
Recommend RSS Feed
Join Buyers Guide
Host a Strategy Session
List a Calendar Event
Give Us Feedback
Contact Mercator Advisory Group